Romney narrows vp choices; condi emerges as frontrunner

[JBond]

That's because I consider it nonsense. It would be like saying Rice helped Hamas rise to power through her endorsement of democratic elections in Palestine.

Rice did not actively support Hamas. What the hell are you talking about? When did Rice athorize or endorse bombing the crap of of those that disagree with Hamas to pave the way for their rise to power?

Your boy has actively supported terrorists. You can stick your ignorant head in the sand and claim it is not true all you want, but it does not change the facts. Obama supports terror groups and has used our military to support their efforts.

Why do you support terrorists? You fucked up party cried like little bitches when we fought the Russians. Now that your piece of shit is supporting terrorists you are fine with it. You are the most intellectually dishonest person I have ever dealt with.

You lie with the same ease Obama does. Leftists have no conscience or sense or morality apparently.

[JBond]

But that's not what we're talking about. This isn't about Romney attacking Obama based on his foreign policy. This is about Obama attacking Rice based on foreign policy initiatives that he's continued.

That's where the internal consistency issue comes in.

Obama worshipers will say or do anything. They are crazy.

The 2040 killed under the dysfunctional Obama war plan for Afghanistan far eclipses the total of eight years under the Bush plan.

Obama has continued almost all the Bush era policies. New boss same as the old boss. Some just refuse to see it. The Iraq war was ended because Bush ended it. Not the obumbler. To say otherwise is a flat out lie. But that is what leftist must resort to. Lies. It is all they have.

[erdawiro]

Rice did not actively support Hamas. What the hell are you talking about? When did Rice athorize or endorse bombing the crap of of those that disagree with Hamas to pave the way for their rise to power?

Your boy has actively supported terrorists. You can stick your ignorant head in the sand and claim it is not true all you want, but it does not change the facts. Obama supports terror groups and has used our military to support their efforts.

Why do you support terrorists? You fucked up party cried like little bitches when we fought the Russians. Now that your piece of shit is supporting terrorists you are fine with it. You are the most intellectually dishonest person I have ever dealt with.

You lie with the same ease Obama does. Leftists have no conscience or sense or morality apparently.

Obama supports terrorists! I support terrorists! We all support terrorists, hurrah!

I honestly don't know what the fuck you're talking about, so please be more specific. Dig my head out for me, JBond.

[JBond]

nevermind...you just want to play games. I guess you were unaware of bamsters support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt and elswhere.

[erdawiro]

Ah, right, I forgot that supporting popular uprisings that seek to establish democratic rule was a bad thing.

To quote Rice:

Unlike tyranny, democracy by its very nature is never imposed. Citizens of conviction must choose it -- and not just in one election. The work of democracy is a daily process to build the institutions of democracy: the rule of law, an independent judiciary, free media and property rights, among others. The United States cannot manufacture these outcomes, but we can and must create opportunities for individuals to assume ownership of their own lives and nations. Our power gains its greatest legitimacy when we support the natural right of all people, even those who disagree with us, to govern themselves in liberty.

Democratic Peace Theory, my friend.

[iceberg]

Ah, right, I forgot that supporting popular uprisings that seek to establish democratic rule was a bad thing.

To quote Rice:

Democratic Peace Theory, my friend.

except obama seems to want everyone to rely on the government, not "ownership of their own lives".

[erdawiro]

except obama seems to want everyone to rely on the government, not "ownership of their own lives".

Having a social safety net in a democratic society and being subjected to rule by decree in a dictatorship are completely different issues.

[iceberg]

Having a social safety net in a democratic society and being subjected to rule by decree in a dictatorship are completely different issues.

agreed. so what does it take to see someone "crossing the line"?